2don MSNOpinion
The justice and his allies want to treat the foreign-aid case like an everyday spat over the terms of a government contract.
Justice Samuel Alito's dissent was a platform to vent about his views of judicial overreach — while engaging in some himself.
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in rejecting the Trump administration's request to cancel the foreign aid money from USAID.
A judge cleared the way for Trump to fire 800 USAID contractors, rejecting claims of irreparable harm as the administration moves to dismantle the agency.
“I am stunned,” declares Justice Samuel Alito, dissenting in the Supreme ... some $2 billion for work already performed under the aegis of the United States Agency for International Development. A ...
Justice Alito penned a scathing dissent after a majority of the justices refused to let the Trump administration keep ...
The nation's high court ruled 5-4 in rejecting the Trump administration's request to cancel the foreign aid money from the US Agency for International Development. Justice Samuel Alito ...
Justice Samuel Alito issued a scathing dissent Wednesday after the Supreme Court declined to block a lower court’s order forcing the Trump administration to pay $2 billion in foreign aid immediately, ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results